Charles Broom vs Marc Polmans Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Polmans has won 40.82% of their second serve points, while Broom has achieved 45.32% over the past six months. Which player's second serve seems stronger? Broom appears to have the edge here.
• Return Game Stats: Polmans has a slight advantage in second serve returns, winning 47.19% as opposed to Broom's 46.4%. In first serve returns, Polmans leads again, with 29.26% over Broom's 26.91%.
• Under Pressure Analysis: Polmans saved 58.21% of breakpoints lately, whereas Broom managed 57.27%. Both show robust defensive skills under pressure.
• Overall Performance: In the last year, Polmans has a match win rate of 53.19%, slightly higher than Broom's 50% win rate.
• Surface Preference: Both excel on Clay, with Broom performing notably better there, boasting a 67% win rate compared to Polmans' 56%. What surface should we watch for impact? Clay, where Broom shines.
• Player Level: At Challengers/ITF tournaments, Polmans won 47.62% of his matches, while Broom has a 30.77% win rate, suggesting a stronger performance from Polmans.
• Opponent Quality: Polmans faced tougher opponents, with an average opponent rank of 352.51 over the past year, compared to Broom's 362.77.
• Deciding Set Performance: Polmans is more successful, winning 59% of deciding sets compared to Broom's 39%. Could this be crucial if they reach a deciding set? Likely yes, favoring Polmans.
• Break Point Conversion: Polmans converted 30.36% of breakpoints, marginally higher than Broom at 29.01%.

Editorial Prediction (July 19, 2025, UTC):

Recent trends indicate a competitive match between Polmans and Broom. When analyzing second serve performances, Broom appears to have a slight edge, winning a higher percentage of points, which may be a critical factor if serves become a deciding aspect in the match. However, Polmans demonstrates a stronger return game, especially against first serves, which could help him establish more opportunities for breaking serve.

Both players perform comparatively well under pressure, displaying similar breakpoint-saving tendencies. However, Polmans shows slightly better overall performance, with a higher match win percentage over the past year, suggesting a slight edge in match fitness and consistency.

While both players prefer Clay, Broom’s superior win percentage on this surface strengthens his position should the match be held on a clay court. However, Polmans has a proven ability to perform effectively in deciding sets, an area where Broom struggles significantly.

Considering these factors, along with Polmans' advantage in facing slightly stronger competition and his marginally better ability to convert breakpoints, Polmans holds a slight edge. Therefore, Polmans is favored to win this upcoming tennis match.